![]() Cleopatra also argues that it isn’t bound by the Consent Decree because it wasn’t party to the legal action 30 years ago. The defendant says he didn’t direct or produce the film in question, and it’s added that the coming film won’t use the band’s music and will begin with an explicit disclaimer stating that neither Lynyrd Skynyrd nor any bandmember had authorized the film. In court papers opposing a preliminary injunction ( see here), Cleopatra’s attorney speaks of how Pyle was once assisting in the writing of the script, but that after plaintiffs complained about his role, Pyle’s writing involvement ended. ![]() Also being sued is the film division of Cleopatra Records. Following the judge’s order, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, adopted by a judge as a “Consent Order.”Īrtimus Pyle, who joined the band as a drummer in 1974, is described as a signatory to the Consent Order, although he evidently attempted to sign it “under protest.” Nevertheless, suing Lynyrd Skynyrd parties maintain he is restrained through agreement and court order from authorizing or participating in any story that purports to be a history of the band. A judge at the time heard about the “blood oath,” considered trademark law as well, and came to the conclusion that a “Lynyrd Skynyrd Live” album in conjunction with a 1987 tour would confuse consumers. Ten years after the crash, a tour by surviving members of the band would set off litigation about use of the band’s name. ![]() As described in newly unsealed court papers ( read here), survivors agreed “never to use the name Lynyrd Skynyrd again in an effort not to capitalize on the tragedy that had befallen the group.” The dispute emanates from a “blood oath” taken upon the plane crash that befell the 1970s band which popularized Southern rock. Grammys: Olivia Rodrigo, Lana Del Rey, Jon Batiste Shut Out Despite Multiple Nominations
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |